WHR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Las Vegas Sands has a net margin of -9.48% compared to Whirlpool's net margin of 11.19%. Whirlpool's return on equity of -10.96% beat Las Vegas Sands's return on equity of 38.4%.

Whirlpool has a consensus price target of $112.71, signalling upside risk potential of 10.73%. On the other hand Las Vegas Sands has an analysts' consensus of $57.95 which suggests that it could grow by 29.62%. Given that Las Vegas Sands has higher upside potential than Whirlpool, analysts believe Las Vegas Sands is more attractive than Whirlpool.

Whirlpool has a beta of 1.438, which suggesting that the stock is 43.773% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Las Vegas Sands has a beta of 1.072, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.242%.

Whirlpool has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.88%. Las Vegas Sands offers a yield of 1.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Whirlpool pays -118.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Las Vegas Sands pays out 40.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Las Vegas Sands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Whirlpool quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than Las Vegas Sands quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Whirlpool's net income of -$392M is lower than Las Vegas Sands's net income of $324M. Notably, Whirlpool's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.80x while Las Vegas Sands's PE ratio is 22.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Whirlpool is 0.34x versus 2.91x for Las Vegas Sands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Starbucks has a net margin of -9.48% compared to Whirlpool's net margin of 8.31%. Whirlpool's return on equity of -10.96% beat Starbucks's return on equity of --.

Whirlpool has a consensus price target of $112.71, signalling upside risk potential of 10.73%. On the other hand Starbucks has an analysts' consensus of $106.67 which suggests that it could fall by -7.89%. Given that Whirlpool has higher upside potential than Starbucks, analysts believe Whirlpool is more attractive than Starbucks.

Whirlpool has a beta of 1.438, which suggesting that the stock is 43.773% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Starbucks has a beta of 0.993, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.692%.

Whirlpool has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.88%. Starbucks offers a yield of 2.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share. Whirlpool pays -118.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Starbucks pays out 68.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Starbucks's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Whirlpool quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are smaller than Starbucks quarterly revenues of $9.4B. Whirlpool's net income of -$392M is lower than Starbucks's net income of $780.8M. Notably, Whirlpool's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.80x while Starbucks's PE ratio is 37.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Whirlpool is 0.34x versus 3.64x for Starbucks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of -9.48% compared to Whirlpool's net margin of 9.17%. Whirlpool's return on equity of -10.96% beat Tesla's return on equity of 10.47%.

Whirlpool has a consensus price target of $112.71, signalling upside risk potential of 10.73%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $345.56 which suggests that it could grow by 17.95%. Given that Tesla has higher upside potential than Whirlpool, analysts believe Tesla is more attractive than Whirlpool.

Whirlpool has a beta of 1.438, which suggesting that the stock is 43.773% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.504, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 150.394%.

Whirlpool has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.88%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Whirlpool pays -118.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Whirlpool quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.7B. Whirlpool's net income of -$392M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Whirlpool's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.80x while Tesla's PE ratio is 143.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Whirlpool is 0.34x versus 10.49x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wolverine World Wide has a net margin of -9.48% compared to Whirlpool's net margin of 4.97%. Whirlpool's return on equity of -10.96% beat Wolverine World Wide's return on equity of 16.59%.

Whirlpool has a consensus price target of $112.71, signalling upside risk potential of 10.73%. On the other hand Wolverine World Wide has an analysts' consensus of $22.89 which suggests that it could grow by 54.76%. Given that Wolverine World Wide has higher upside potential than Whirlpool, analysts believe Wolverine World Wide is more attractive than Whirlpool.

Whirlpool has a beta of 1.438, which suggesting that the stock is 43.773% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wolverine World Wide has a beta of 1.931, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.074%.

Whirlpool has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.88%. Wolverine World Wide offers a yield of 2.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Whirlpool pays -118.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Wolverine World Wide pays out 67.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Wolverine World Wide's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Whirlpool quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than Wolverine World Wide quarterly revenues of $494.7M. Whirlpool's net income of -$392M is lower than Wolverine World Wide's net income of $24.6M. Notably, Whirlpool's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.80x while Wolverine World Wide's PE ratio is 26.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Whirlpool is 0.34x versus 0.67x for Wolverine World Wide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.